USPTO serial 78585916
COOLBLOOMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 16, 2008
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COOLBLOOMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jordan Station, Ontario, CA
Jordan Station, Ontario, CA
Jordan Station, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TRACY A. AGRALL
TRACY A. AGRALL TRACY A. AGRALL, ATTORNEY AT LAWPO BOX 27337FRESNO, CA 93729-7337UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | LIVE POTTED PLANTS; LIVE PLANT BULBS; FLORAL OR PLANT ARRANGEMENTS WITH LIVE OR CUT FLOWERS OR LIVE PLANTS OR PLANT CUTTINGS OR COMBINATIONS THEREOF; CUT FLOWERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING ON-LINE EXHIBITIONS AND DISPLAYS AND INTERACTIVE EXHIBITS IN THE FIELD OF FLOWERS AND PLANTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 804935 ONTARIO LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by 804935 ONTARIO LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by 804935 ONTARIO LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named COOLBLOOMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 30, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 30, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |