Drawing for FLEXFILTER

USPTO serial 78586050

FLEXFILTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEXFILTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine Mennenga

Catherine Mennenga General Electric Company3135 Easton TurnpikeCorporate Trademark OperationsFairfield, CT 06828-0001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial disposable plastic bioreactors and filters containing internal partitions for use mixing, agitating and separating liquids and powders; industrial mixers, agitators and separators for use in mixing, agitating and separating liquids and powders; industrial mixers, agitators and separators for use in mixing, agitating and separating liquids and powders for use in the pharmaceuticals and chemical industriesACTIVE—
009Laboratory mixers, agitators and separators for use in mixing, agitating and separating liquids and powders for laboratory and industrial use; laboratory mixers, agitators and separators for mixing, agitating and separating liquids and powders for use in the pharmaceutical and chemical industries; apparatus for cell culture for laboratory and industrial use, namely, disposable plastic bioreactors and filters containing internal partitions for cell culturingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 1, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance