USPTO serial 78586340
BIOSOAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOSOAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, like laundry bleach, products ,powder laundry soaps ,laundry softeners general purposed cleaning products, alkaline and acid liquid soups, liquid degreaser, floor waxes, floor cleaning products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |