Drawing for HOME FEELS BETTER.  AKSYS

USPTO serial 78586437

HOME FEELS BETTER. AKSYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOME FEELS BETTER. AKSYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. Fairhall

THOMAS A FAIRHALL MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP300 S WACKER DR STE 3200CHICAGO, IL 60606-6709UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical compositions used in dialysis, namely batch quantity dialysate chemical formulations for use in preparation of dialysate solutionsACTIVE—
010Dialysis machines; apparatus for taking blood consisting of medical tubing for use in passing blood through dialysis machinesACTIVE—
016Operators Manuals for dialysis machinesACTIVE—
037Technical support services, namely providing information to dialysis patients about the maintenance of dialysis machinesACTIVE—
041Training services, namely providing clinical training for dialysis patients on the use and operation of dialysis machinesACTIVE—
042Technical support services for dialysis patients, namely troubleshooting of hardware and software problems associated with the use and operation of dialysis machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance