Drawing for MEETINGS-IN-A-BOX

USPTO serial 78586478

MEETINGS-IN-A-BOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
Law office
PRE-PUBLICATION FINAL REVIEW

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEETINGS-IN-A-BOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caroline G. Chicoine, Charles H. Fendell, Richard E. Haferkamp, John M. Howell, Kevin M. Kercher, Paul A. Maddock, Alan H. Norman, Thomas A. Polcyn, Joseph M. Rolnicki, Mark Sableman, Richard H. Shear, Kenneth Solomon, David B. Jinkins, Matthew A. Braunel

CAROLINE G CHICOINE CHARLES H FENDELL THOMPSON COBURN LLPONE US BANK PLZSAINT LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Kits consisting of printed instructional materials in the form of books, manuals and pamphlets, prerecorded CD-roms and disks, and prerecorded videotape recordings, in the field of corporate internal employee education, on the subject of customer serviceABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 26, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Dec 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 14, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance