USPTO serial 78586486
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marlin R. Smith
MARLIN R SMITH KONNEKER & SMITH PC660 N CENTRAL EXPY STE 230PLANO, TX 75074-6765UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Oil and gas well downhole power operated tools and equipment, namely, sliding sleeve valves, chokes and water control equipment; electric generators. | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2001 |
| 009 | Oil and gas well electrical and scientific equipment, namely, pressure regulators for oil and gas production; automatic liquid-flow control machines and instruments; automatic pressure control machines and instruments; control valves and chokes for regulating the flow of gases and liquids; electromechanical controls for use in oil and gas production; remote control telemetering machines and apparatus; remote controls for oil and gas well valves and chokes; audio-video receivers; computer software for use in the encryption and decryption of digital files, including video, text, binary, still images, graphics and multimedia files; interface circuits for video cameras; video cameras; video monitors; video transmission apparatus; computer programs for project management, production management, production optimization, component selection and integration, data and signal transmission, hardware operations and control, and analysis, manipulation, recognition, compression and decompression of data for oil and gas well electrical and scientific equipment; computers for data compression and decompression, data recognition and flow control; flow regulators for oil and gas production; batteries; sensors for the determination of temperature, pressure, flow rate and fluid composition. | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2001 |
| 042 | Services for oil and gas wells, namely, analysis of oil fields; analysis services for oil field exploration; computer consultation; computer project management services; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; creation of control programs for automated measurement, assembly, adjustment, and related visualization, data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect service data; mechanical engineering; designing of oil and gas wells and related surface equipment. | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |