Drawing for COMPLEX NEEDS - SMARTER SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 78586507

COMPLEX NEEDS - SMARTER SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPLEX NEEDS - SMARTER SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James Conte

JAMES CONTE SUITE4400BARNES & THORNBURGONE N.WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial rotary positive displacement blowers, stationary air compressors and vacuum pumps; industrial blower, compressor, and pump machine apparatus for providing air in industrial plant applications comprising rotary positive displacement blowers, stationary air compressors or vacuum pumps, electric motors, cooling systems, air and oil separators and housings in the nature of a metal cabinet and replacement parts therefore; components, consumables, and accessories for industrial blower, compressor, and pump machines, namely, clutches, gearings, couplings, belt drives, variable speed drives, filters, separators, coalescers, and valvesACTIVE—
037Maintenance, repair, installation, and servicing of industrial blowers, of industrial compressors, of industrial pumps, of industrial blower, compressor, and pump apparatus, and of components for industrial blower, compressor, and pump apparatusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance