Drawing for ORGANIC ROOT

USPTO serial 78586621

ORGANIC ROOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORGANIC ROOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy K. DuCharme

NANCY K DUCHARME LAW OFFICE OF NANCY K DUCHARMEPO BOX 222TINLEY PARK, IL 60477-0222UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care preparations; skin clarifiers; skin cleansers; skin cleansing lotion; skin conditioners; skin cream; skin emollients; skin lotion; skin soap; skin masks; skin moisturizers; skin moisturizer masks; skin toners; non-medicated skin serum; shaving preparations; shaving foam; shaving balm; shaving gel; and shaving creamACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance