Drawing for BE SAVVY INNOVATIVE PART OF THE TEAM ENGAGED A LEADER A TRUSTED GUIDE IN TOUCH FORTHRIGHT

USPTO serial 78587198

BE SAVVY INNOVATIVE PART OF THE TEAM ENGAGED A LEADER A TRUSTED GUIDE IN TOUCH FORTHRIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BE SAVVY INNOVATIVE PART OF THE TEAM ENGAGED A LEADER A TRUSTED GUIDE IN TOUCH FORTHRIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alfred R. Hupp, Jr.

ALFRED R HUPP JR LATHROP & GAGE LC2345 GRAND BLVD STE 2800KANSAS CITY, MO 64108-2684UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036administration of qualified and non-qualified group retirement and savings plans, annuities, individual retirement accounts, and employee welfare benefit plans; underwriting of insurance company investment contracts; organization of, financial sponsorship of, administration of, and provision of investment advice to mutual funds and collective investment funds; distribution and redemption of mutual fund and collective investment fund shares and interests; and institutional investment management servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance