USPTO serial 78587313
IOLOGIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IOLOGIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shing-Tien City Taipei Hsien, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lin-Yun Cheng
LIN-YUN CHENG PRO-TECHTOR INTERNATIONAL SERVICES20775 NORADA CTSARATOGA, CA 95070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer networking products, namely, modems, media converters, routers, computer servers, communication servers, terminal servers, multiplexers, gateways, network interface cards for computers in the form of printed circuits, wireless LAN cards for connecting portable computer devices to computer networks, hubs, fiber optic couplers, switches, computer network management hardware and computer network management software and associated networking software used to manage virtual or physical servers; electrical power supplies; printed circuit boards; integrated circuits; computer chips; analog-to-digital converters; digital-to-analog converters; signal processors; computer hardware, namely, multiport microchip cards for controlling serial devices such as modems and other industrial machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |