Drawing for DEFINING REHABILITATION

USPTO serial 78587443

DEFINING REHABILITATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEFINING REHABILITATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judith L. Grubner

JUDITH L GRUBNER MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLPSTE 2000TWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ 180 N STETSON AVECHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044HOSPITALS, AND HEALTH CARE SERVICESACTIVEMar 6, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 21, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 20, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance