USPTO serial 78587548
LEAVES PER OUNCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3150602Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 3, 2006
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LEAVES PER OUNCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Renee S. Rutkowski
RENEE S RUTKOWSKI LOW & LOWPO BOX 2184ARLINGTON, VA 22202-0184UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY AROMATHERAPY PRODUCTS, NAMELY AROMATHERAPY CREAMS, LOTIONS, OILS AND SPRITZES, COSMETICS, HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHAMPOOS, HAIR CONDITIONERS, STYLING GELS, HAIR MOISTURIZERS, HAIR COLORING, BODY LOTIONS, MOISTURIZERS, BODY, HAND AND FACE CREAMS, DEODORANTS, FACE PACKS, NAMELY FACIAL BEAUTY MASKS, FACIAL AND SKIN MASKS, SKIN TONERS, FACE AND BODY SCRUBS, WIPES, NAMELY PRE-MOISTENED COSMETIC WIPES, BATH AND BODY SOAPS, FACE AND BODY CLEANSERS, HAIR SPRITZES, MISTS, NAMELY TOPICAL SKIN SPRAYS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, MAKEUP REMOVER, PERFUME, COLOGNE, TOOTHPASTE, MOUTHWASH, SHAVING CREAM, AFTER SHAVE LOTION, SUNSCREEN; BABY CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY BABY SHAMPOO, BABY LOTION, BABY WIPES, BABY CREAMS, NAMELY NON-MEDICATED DIAPER RASH CREAMS, BABY POWDER; HOUSEHOLD CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, LAUNDRY DEODORIZERS, LAUNDRY DETERGENT, STAIN REMOVERS, FABRIC SOFTENERS, CLOTHING AND FIBER TREATMENT PRODUCTS, NAMELY WRINKLE REMOVING SPRAYS, SCENTED LINEN WATERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 24, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |