USPTO serial 78587724
ESSENCHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3522460Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2008
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ESSENCHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ESSENCHA TEA HOUSE & FINE TEAS, INC.
CINCINNATI, OH
Other trademarks owned by ESSENCHA TEA HOUSE & FINE TEAS, INC.
ESSENCHA TEA HOUSE & FINE TEAS, INC.
CINCINNATI, OH
Other trademarks owned by ESSENCHA TEA HOUSE & FINE TEAS, INC.
CINCINNATI, OH
Floating Leaf Teahouse & Fine Teas, Inc.
Cincinnati, OH
Other trademarks owned by Floating Leaf Teahouse & Fine Teas, Inc.
Floating Leaf Teahouse & Fine Teas, Inc.
Cincinnati, OH
Other trademarks owned by Floating Leaf Teahouse & Fine Teas, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rene M. LaForte
RENE M. LAFORTE THOMPSON HINE LLP10 W. SECOND STREET 2000 COURTHOUSE PLAZANEDAYTON, OH 45402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store, online-retail store services, specializing in and focusing primarily on the sale of tea, and also featuring pastries, chocolates, candy, boxed lunches, tea pots, coffee and tea cups, teapot burners and warmers, tea sets and accessories, pottery, ceramics, books, gift baskets, gift cards, and gift items | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2005 |
| 043 | Tea rooms; Restaurant and catering services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ESSENCHA TEA HOUSE & FINE TEAS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ESSENCHA TEA HOUSE & FINE TEAS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OAKLEY TEA HOUSE LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Floating Leaf Teahouse & Fine Teas, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Floating Leaf Teahouse & Fine Teas, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named ESSENCHA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |