Drawing for FOUNDATION SOURCE CENTER FOR INFORMED PHILANTHROPY

USPTO serial 78587901

FOUNDATION SOURCE CENTER FOR INFORMED PHILANTHROPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FOUNDATION SOURCE CENTER FOR INFORMED PHILANTHROPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald A. Clayton, Esq.

RONALD A CLAYTON ESQ FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 38NEW YORK, NY 10112-3800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Website that will provide the public with access to information on IRS-approved charities and other information regarding philanthropy, namely access to charity rating services; access to a database of public charities; access to whitepapers on private foundations and charitable giving; access to real-time information on products, services, philanthropy and IRS rules and regulations;links to web sites of charitable organizations; links to free e-newsletters provided by third parties; access to a charity gateway for making grant requests of private foundation clients; and access to an online tool that allows grant-receiving charities to submit performance reports to the funding foundationsACTIVE—
042Vehicles to assist consumers in making more informed decisions regarding the allocation of their charitable contributions, namely, access to charity rating services; access to a database of public charities; access to whitepapers on private foundations and charitable giving; access to real-time information on products, services, philanthropy and IRS rules and regulations; links to websites of charitable organizations; links to free e-newsletters provided by third parties; access to a charity gateway for making grant requests of private foundation clients; and access to an online tool that allows grant-receiving charities to submit performance reports to the funding foundationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance