USPTO serial 78587901
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald A. Clayton, Esq.
RONALD A CLAYTON ESQ FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 38NEW YORK, NY 10112-3800UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Website that will provide the public with access to information on IRS-approved charities and other information regarding philanthropy, namely access to charity rating services; access to a database of public charities; access to whitepapers on private foundations and charitable giving; access to real-time information on products, services, philanthropy and IRS rules and regulations;links to web sites of charitable organizations; links to free e-newsletters provided by third parties; access to a charity gateway for making grant requests of private foundation clients; and access to an online tool that allows grant-receiving charities to submit performance reports to the funding foundations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Vehicles to assist consumers in making more informed decisions regarding the allocation of their charitable contributions, namely, access to charity rating services; access to a database of public charities; access to whitepapers on private foundations and charitable giving; access to real-time information on products, services, philanthropy and IRS rules and regulations; links to websites of charitable organizations; links to free e-newsletters provided by third parties; access to a charity gateway for making grant requests of private foundation clients; and access to an online tool that allows grant-receiving charities to submit performance reports to the funding foundations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |