USPTO serial 78588076
Serial No. 78588076
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78588076?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne B. Bochinski
JULIANNE B BOCHINSKI LAW OFFICE OF JULIANNE B BOCHINSKIPO BOX 2723WESTPORT, CT 06880-0723UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CD'S, DVD'S, VIDEOS, AUDIO CASSETTE TAPES AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FEATURING CHARACTERS FROM ANIMATED CARTOON SERIES INCLUDING MUSIC | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | COMIC BOOKS, STICKERS, POSTERS, PHOTOGRAPH'S, CHILDREN'S PICTURE BOOKS, CALENDARS, DRAWINGS, POST CARDS, COLLECTIBLE PRINTED CARDS, COLLECTIBLE TRADING CARDS, GREETING CARDS; SCHOOL SUPPLIES, NAMELY, PENS, PENCILS, STATIONERY, BOOK COVERS, FOLDERS, BINDERS, DIARIES, COLORING BOOKS, AND PARTY FAVORS MADE OF PAPER, TABLE CLOTHS OF PAPER AND PAPER NAPKINS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 018 | BACK PACKS, TOTE BAGS, MESSENGER BAGS, HANDBAGS, WALLETS, COIN PURSES, LEATHER KEY CHAINS AND UMBRELLAS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 024 | TEXTILE TABLECLOTHS AND NAPKINS; TABLE LINENS, BEDDING, NAMELY, BED LINENS, COMFORTERS, BLANKETS; BATH LINENS, BATH TOWELS, BEACH TOWELS AND SHOWER CURTAINS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 025 | CASUAL CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SHORTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, SWEAT PANTS, VESTS, JACKETS, HATS, CAPS, SCARVES, UNDERWEAR, HALLOWEEN COSTUMES AND DRESS-UP COSTUMES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 028 | GAMES AND TOYS, NAMELY, HANDHELD UNITS FOR PLAYING VIDEO GAMES, DOLLS, TOY ACTION FIGURES, PLUSH DOLLS, BENDABLE FIGURE DOLLS AND DOLL CLOTHING AND ACCESSORIES ASSOCIATED THEREWITH, NAMELY, MINIATURE TOY INSTRUMENTS, MINIATURE CARS AND VANS, MINIATURE TIME ERA DOLL HOUSES, BALLOONS; AND, SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY, SNOW BOARDS, SURF BOARDS, BEACH BALLS, AND BALLS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY PRODUCTION OF AN ANIMATED CARTOON SERIES, MOTION PICTURES, AND STREAMING VIDEO VIA THE INTERNET OF A CARTOON SERIES | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cummings, Amy R.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |