CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MXF

USPTO serial 78588176

MXF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MXF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009X-ray apparatus for non-medical use, namely x-ray machines for forming parallel beams of x-rays, x-ray reflector arrays to parallelize x-ray beams, x-ray machines for generating narrow-band x-ray beams and x-ray filters to selectively filter x-ray beamsACTIVE—
010X-ray apparatus for medical use, namely x-ray machines for generating narrow-band x-ray beams and x-ray filters to selectively filter x-ray beamsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 29, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2008WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2008WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 13, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 28, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 11, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance