Drawing for XO-86 PET STAIN & ODOR ELIMINATOR

USPTO serial 78588601

XO-86 PET STAIN & ODOR ELIMINATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XO-86 PET STAIN & ODOR ELIMINATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George A. Kurisky, Jr.

GEORGE A KURISKY JR JOHNSON DELUCA KENNEDY & KURISKY PC1221 LAMAR ST STE 1000HOUSTON, TX 77010-3050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003combination cleaner and deodorizer for pet odorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 7, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 28, 2007PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 28, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 18, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2005GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Oct 12, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance