USPTO serial 78588869
FRENCH KISS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRENCH KISS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beate Boudro
Beate Boudro Beate Boudro, Attorney at LawP.O. Box 16560Las Cruces, NM 88004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric and electronic apparatus, devices and instruments and for gambling and gaming, namely, automated dispensing machines dispensing and accepting coins, paper money, tokens, magnetic strip cards, electronic tokens, memory cards, micro-processor cards, contactless chip cards, optical memory cards, chits, embossed cards, and read/write tickets; coin operated machines and machines operable with paper money, tokens, magnetic cards, micro-processor devices and chits, namely, slot machines with or without video output, gambling machines and gaming machines; electric and electronic machines and apparatuses for gambling, gaming, entertainment and sports games, namely, slot machines, gaming and entertainment machines, betting machines, video slot machines, casino gambling machines; all of the afore-mentioned machines and apparatuses also for networked use; mechanisms for coin-operated machines and coin controlled machines, namely, mounting parts for and sold as a component of vending machines, money change machines, entertainment, gambling and gaming machines, operable with coins, paper money, tokens, magnetic strip cards, electronic tokens, memory cards, micro-processor cards, optical memory cards, chits, embossed cards, read/write tickets; computer programs for operating electric and electronic machines for gambling, gaming, amusement and entertainment purposes; calculators for calculating transactions performed on machines operated with currency and currency surrogate carriers; data printers, namely, computer printers, daisy wheel printers, dot matrix printers, impact printers, ink-jet color printers, laser printers, thermo printers; printed circuit boards; money change machines, vending machines providing chits, coupons, and game cards; machine-readable data carriers programmed to operate the afore-mentioned machines and apparatuses; encoded smart cards and memory cards containing programming used for pocket-sized hand held units for playing electronic games; video game machines, namely, slot machines provided with a TV monitor, a TFT monitor or a similar display monitor | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Stand-alone coin-operated compact sports game machines and stand-alone coin-operated compact sports video game machines, all featuring darts, table soccer, pool-billiard, snooker, shooting galleries; hand-held units for playing electronic games; toys, namely, stuffed toy animals, toy figures, toy vehicles; stand alone video game machines featuring amusement, entertainment and sports themes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Atronic International GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named FRENCH KISS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |