USPTO serial 78589008
LAYALINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- GAAFAR, SAMIR MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LAYALINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fullerton, CA, US
Fullerton, CA, US
LAYALINA TOBACCO MANUFACTURING F.Z.C.
AJMAN, AE
Other trademarks owned by LAYALINA TOBACCO MANUFACTURING F.Z.C.
LAYALINA TOBACCO MANUFACTURING F.Z.C.
AJMAN, AE
Other trademarks owned by LAYALINA TOBACCO MANUFACTURING F.Z.C.
EMIRATES TOBACCO MANUFACTURING F.Z.C.
AJMAN FREE ZONE, AE
Other trademarks owned by EMIRATES TOBACCO MANUFACTURING F.Z.C.
DUBAI, AE
DUBAI, AE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY H. GREGER
Jeffrey H. Greger Hauptman Ham, LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314-2866Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Tobacco | ACTIVE | Oct 10, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Elhalwani, Wael S.
- Other trademarks owned by Elhalwani, Wael S.
- Other trademarks owned by LAYALINA TOBACCO MANUFACTURING F.Z.C.
- Other trademarks owned by LAYALINA TOBACCO MANUFACTURING F.Z.C.
- Other trademarks owned by EMIRATES TOBACCO MANUFACTURING F.Z.C.
- Other trademarks owned by EMIRATES TOBACCO FACTORY MFG.
- Other trademarks owned by EMIRATES TOBACCO FACTORY MFG.
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named LAYALINA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 13, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 13, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 12, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |