Drawing for CUSTOMFX BY A1 CARDONE

USPTO serial 78589048

CUSTOMFX BY A1 CARDONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUSTOMFX BY A1 CARDONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R. Meyer

James R. Meyer Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLPSuite 36001600 Market StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Water pumps, smog air pumps, vacuum pumps, wiper motors, headlamp motors, window wiper motors, window lift motors and gears, blower motors, radiator cooling motors, tailgate motors, drive shafts, prop shafts, and parts therefor, all for motor vehiclesACTIVE—
009Engine control computers and computer chips, mass airflow sensors, vane airflow meters, body control computers, prom chips, transmission control modules, power supply, modules relay, cruise control modules, air supply modules, anti-lock brake modules and controls, ignition distributors, and parts therefor, all for motor vehiclesACTIVE—
012Brake master cylinders, power brake units, hydraulic units, power steering, power steering pumps, steering gears, rack and pinion steering units, control valves, power cylinders, power steering filters, master cylinders, power brake booster packs, and parts therefor, all for motor vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 22, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 3, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 3, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 26, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 26, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 2, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance