USPTO serial 78589367
BISTRO FAIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BISTRO FAIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J. DAY
CHRISTOPHER J DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DAY301 E BETHANY HOME RD STE A-213PHOENIX, AZ 85012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FRESH AND FROZEN PRE-PACKAGED COMPLETE MEALS WITH ENTREE, VEGETABLE, AND STARCH COMPONENTS CONSISTING OF MEAT, POULTRY, FISH, VEGETABLES, OR A COMBINATION OF THESE ITEMS; FRESH OR FROZEN PRE-PACKED MEAT, POULTRY, FISH, AND PROCESSED VEGETABLES; FRESH OR FROZEN PRE-PACKAGED APPETIZERS, NAMELY, BEAN DIP, BEEF, BACON, CHEESE, CHILE, CLAMS, COMPOTES, CRAB CAKES, CRANBERRY SAUCE, DAIRY-BASED DIPS, EGGPLANT PARMIGIANA, EGGS, FISH, MEAT, FRUIT-BASED SNACK FOOD, GUACAMOLE, HAM, HUMMUS, LIVER, PATE, PANCAKES, POTATO-BASED SNACK FOODS, PROCESSED APPLES, PROCESSED ARTICHOKES, PROCESSED ASPARAGUS, PROCESSED BEANS, PROCESSED CABBAGE, PROCESSED MUSHROOMS, PROCESSED PEPPERS, PROCESSED ONIONS, PROCESSED POTATOES, FISH, PROCESSED VEGETABLES AND FRUITS, PROCESSED YAMS, SEAFOOD, STEWS, TAHINI, TAPENADES, MEAT-BASED MOUSSE, POULTRY-BASED MOUSSE, VEGETABLE-BASED MOUSSE, AND VEGETABLE SALADS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | FRESH OR FROZEN PRE-PACKAGED DESSERTS, NAMELY, BAKERY DESSERTS, BLINTZES, CORN FRITTERS, CREPES, FRUIT MOUSSE, CHOCOLATE MOUSSE, PUDDINGS, DESSERT SOUFFLES, FRUIT PIES; PASTIES, PIES FRESH OR FROZEN PRE-PACKAGED APPETIZERS, NAMELY, BURRITOS, CALZONES, CHIMICHANGA, DOUGH-BASED POCKETS WITH FILLING CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEATS, POUTRY, FISH, FRUITS, VEGETABLES, CHEESE AND PASTA OR RICE, DUMPLINGS, EGG ROLLS, EMPANADAS, ENCHILADAS, FAJITAS, FILO, FISH SANDWICHES, HAMBURGER SANDWICHES, HOAGIES, HUSHPUPPIES, LASAGNA, MACARONI SALAD, MATZO, MEAT PIES, PIEROGIES, PIZZA, POLENTA, POT PIES, POTSTICKERS, QUESADILLAS, QUICHE, RAVIOLI, RISOTTO, SALSA, SANDWICHES, SPRING ROLLS, TAMALES, WON TONS, AND WHEAT-BASED SNACK FOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |