Drawing for TECH TALK

USPTO serial 78589598

TECH TALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3336116Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 13, 2007
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with TECH TALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LEON E REDMAN

LEON E REDMAN MASCO CORP21001 VAN BORN RDTAYLOR, MI 48180UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded videos, namely, DVD's on the installation and repair of hot tubs and spasSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 28, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Nov 13, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 7, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 1, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 21, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 21, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 14, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 10, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 17, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 17, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 12, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance