USPTO serial 78589720
FORMULAH2O
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORMULAH2O?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GENE W ARANT
PO BOX 269LINCOLN CITY, OR 97367-0269UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Liquid chemical for water treatment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |