USPTO serial 78589829
OKI OK INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OKI OK INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
DAVID J. DAVIS BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP300 E. Randolph StreetSuite 5000CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric soldering and desoldering apparatus; rework apparatus, namely, apparatus for reworking specialized arrays of electronic components, by heating, removal, placement, and resoldering of electronic components attached to a printed circuit board; electric powered soldering and desoldering fume extraction apparatus; electric power supplies for electric powered soldering and desoldering apparatus; electric powered soldering and desoldering irons and replaceable heater cartridges for use with electric powered soldering and desoldering apparatus; automated and manual industrial fluid dispensers and structural parts therefor, namely, dispensing syringes, receiver heads, dispensing tips, dispenser cartridges, plungers, nozzles, needle adapters, end caps, seals, two components cartridge packaging and mixing kits, comprised of a cartridge, a rod with piston, a mix head, a cap and a tapped barrier, mix heads and rods, cartridge dispensing guns, plunger seals, flow restrictors, retaining nuts, dispensing mixers, fluid dispensing valves, dispensing pens, valves, dispensing controllers, pressure dispensers, fluid line assemblies, adapters, for use in electronic assembly and repair, and tool fabrication, assembly, and encapsulation | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Air purification units comprised of air filtering units, ventilating exhaust fans, exhaust arms and exhaust nozzles, devices for measuring and controlling airflow, devices for measuring air quality, sold as a unit; down draft stations, namely, workstations for exhaust of fumes and gases; ventilation hoods for fume exhaust of non-laboratory work areas; electric cabinets for controlling fume exhaust and replacement air filters for use therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |