USPTO serial 78590220
STAMP ME BEAUTIFUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STAMP ME BEAUTIFUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL J. MEANEY, JR
DANIEL J MEANEY JR LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL J, MEANEY JRPO BOX 22307SANTA BARBARA, CA 93121-2307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | COSMETIC AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, STAMPING DEVICES FOR APPLYING A COSMETIC PRODUCT, IMPRINTING DEVICES FOR APPLYING A COSMETIC PRODUCT, IMPRINTING DEVICES, STAMPING DEVICES FOR APPLYING EYEBROWS, EYEBROW STAMPS, IMPRINTING STAMPS, STAMPING DEVICES FOR APPLYING IMAGES TO A BODY PART USING A COSMETIC INK, STAMPING DEVICES FOR APPLYING IMAGES TO A BODY PART USING A COSMETIC PRODUCT, IMPRINTING DEVICES FOR APPLYING IMAGES TO A BODY PART USING A COSMETIC INK, IMPRINTING DEVICES FOR APPLYING IMAGES TO A BODY PART USING A COSMETIC PRODUCT, ARTIFICIAL EYEBROW STAMPING DEVICES AND ARTIFICIAL EYEBROW IMPRINTING DEVICES, ALL IN INTERNATIONAL CLASS O31 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |