USPTO serial 78590237
QTP QUALITY TAKES PRIORITY LA QUALITE TOUJOURS NOTRE PRIORITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3594914Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 24, 2009
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with QTP QUALITY TAKES PRIORITY LA QUALITE TOUJOURS NOTRE PRIORITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MISSISSAUGA, CA
MISSISSAUGA, CA
MISSISSAUGA, ON, CA
Mississauga, CA
MISSISSAUGA, CA
MISSISSAUGA, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann K. Ford
Ann K. Ford, Esq. DLA Piper US LLP500 8th Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper products, namely, bathroom and facial tissue, paper towels, and paper wipes, namely, disposable wipes not impregnated with chemicals or compounds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Reusable cleaning cloths | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of paper products for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research and development in the field of paper products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KRUGER PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by KRUGER PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by KRUGER PRODUCTS L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Scott Paper Limited
- Other trademarks owned by KRUGER PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by KRUGER PRODUCTS L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QTP QUALITY TAKES PRIORITY LA QUALITE TOUJOURS NOTRE PRIORITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 15, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |