USPTO serial 78590546
INFINITE 88S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFINITE 88S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert D. Katz
Robert D. Katz Cooper & Dunham LLP30 Rockefeller Plaza 20th FloorNew York, NY 10112-0015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | diamonds; jewelry made from precious metals and precious gems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 31, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |