Drawing for STX TACTICAL

USPTO serial 78590583

STX TACTICAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SISUN, SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STX TACTICAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brendan P. McFeely

BRENDAN P MCFEELY KANE KESSLER PC1350 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10019-4702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013Police and military duty gear, namely belts; police and military duty gear belt accessories for attachment to duty gear belts, namely, holsters, ammunition magazine holders, flashlight-carriers, baton holders, handcuff pouches and aerosol spray can holders.ACTIVEDec 16, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 4, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 3, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 14, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 14, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 2, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 2, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 2, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 2, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 2, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance