USPTO serial 78590720
CHAMPAGNE AND ROSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHAMPAGNE AND ROSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denise Taliaferro
Denise Taliaferro GTECH Corporation10 Memorial Blvd.Providence, RI 02903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric and electronic machines for gambling, namely, video slot machines, the aforementioned machines also for networked use | ABANDONED | Sep 11, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |