USPTO serial 78590855
NO-EQUAL PLEDGE OF PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3624667Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 19, 2009
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NO-EQUAL PLEDGE OF PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.
Pleasanton, CA
Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.
Pleasanton, CA
Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.
Dublin, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicolas S. Gold
Nicolas S. Gold LAW OFFICES OF JAMES R. CYPHER409 13th Street, 11th FloorOakland, CA 94612-2607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | anchors; anchor bolts; coupler nuts; plate washers; bearing, foundation, hip corner, framing retrofit, protective, nail stop, ornamental, mending and tie plates; girder, rafter, hip ridge,truss, beam, joist, purlin and header hangers; tension, joist, hurricane, seismic, retrofit,strap, board, post, joist, purlin cross, concealed, corner, wedge form, stud plate, floor, deck,pipe, and brick ties; beam and truss seats; anchor, post and stud holdowns; post and column bases; post and column caps; insulation supports; shearwalls; gable brace, drag strut, hinge, hip, deck, fence, gazebo, truss, ledger, rafter, corner, floor, variable pitch and sloped/skewed connectors; ceiling support, truss, roof, framing, strap, sheathing, blocking and drywall clips; furring, retrofit, ornamental, tension, pre-bent, coiled and twist straps; truss bracer system comprised of tension straps and strap clips; truss spacers; tiedowns; knee,gable, truss and wall braces; angles; fence, shelf, sawhorse, post, and corner brackets; stud shoes; bridging; wall bracing; floor beam jacks; decorative post covers; tiedown systems, namely, applications for anchoring shearwalls in wood frame construction comprised of threaded rods, tension/compression cages, plates, washers, nuts, couplers and take-up devices, namely, springs for automatic take up of slack; take up devices, namely, springs for automatic take up of slack; washers; fasteners, namely, screws, bolts and nails; all of the foregoing goods made primarily of metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named NO-EQUAL PLEDGE OF PERFORMANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |