USPTO serial 78591007
OAKLAND VALLEY RACE PARK CUDDEBACKVILLE, NY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3505275Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2008
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OAKLAND VALLEY RACE PARK CUDDEBACKVILLE, NY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cuddebackville, NY
Cuddebackville, NY
Cuddebackville, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing facilities for go kart racing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oakland Valley, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Oakland Valley, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Oakland Valley, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named OAKLAND VALLEY RACE PARK CUDDEBACKVILLE, NY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |