Drawing for MOVIN

USPTO serial 78591193

MOVIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOVIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Clarke Holman

JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Bathroom accessories, namely, toilet brushes, toilet brush holders, drinking glasses, bathroom glass holders not of precious metal, soap dishes and brackets, soap holders, toilet paper holders, towel holders, towel racks, and towel ringsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 7, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 15, 2006LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Mar 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 5, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance