Drawing for 1-800-WORKERS

USPTO serial 78591690

1-800-WORKERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1-800-WORKERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Carstens

David W. Carstens CARSTENS & CAHOON, LLPPO BOX 802334DALLAS, TX 75380-2334UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of others by licensing a toll-free telephone numberACTIVEJan 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 6, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 6, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 7, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 7, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2007GECGACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2007IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 28, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 29, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 24, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2007AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 19, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 18, 2007EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance