USPTO serial 78592602
ORBITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3990939Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 5, 2011
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORBITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NORCROSS, GA
NORCROSS, GA
NORCROSS, GA
NORCROSS, GA
Furukawa Electric North America, Inc.
Norcross, GA
Other trademarks owned by Furukawa Electric North America, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher I. Donahue
Christopher I. Donahue Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 DUKE STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical fiber management systems composed primarily of a central hub, adapter interfaces, and routers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 10, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OFS FITEL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OFS FITEL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OFS FITEL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OFS FITEL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Furukawa Electric North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ORBITAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 5, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |