USPTO serial 78592712
ZOOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZOOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane L. Gardner
DIANE L GARDNER MASTERMIND IP LAW PC421 SANTA MARINA CTESCONDIDO, CA 92029-7915UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Periodic magazine featuring advertisements for recreational vehicles, parts, accessories, and related services of others | ACTIVE | Mar 17, 2005 |
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, providing advertising space in a periodical featuring advertisements for recreational vehicles, parts, accessories, and related services of others;advertising periodical distribution; advertising recreational vehicles, parts, accessories and related services of others via electronic media in the form of classified advertisements; dissemination of advertisements and advertising material relating to recreational vehicles, parts, accessories and related services of others, in the form of leaflets, brochures and printed matter; dissemination of advertising of recreational vehicles, parts, accessories and related services for others via an online communications network; creating advertising material relating to recreational vehicles, parts, accessories and related services of others | ACTIVE | Mar 14, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |