USPTO serial 78593378
NOUVEAU 2004 TOTIHUE VINEYARD CACHAPOAL VALLEY CHILE GRACIA, DE CHILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOUVEAU 2004 TOTIHUE VINEYARD CACHAPOAL VALLEY CHILE GRACIA, DE CHILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santiago, CL
VINEDOS Y BODEGAS CORPORA S.A.
LAS CONDES, SANTIAGO, CL
VINEDOS Y BODEGAS CORPORA S.A.
LAS CONDES, SANTIAGO, CL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL F. ZENDEL
DANIEL ZENDEL LADAS & PARRY LLP26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VINA GRACIA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by VINEDOS Y BODEGAS CORPORA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by VINEDOS Y BODEGAS CORPORA S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named NOUVEAU 2004 TOTIHUE VINEYARD CACHAPOAL VALLEY CHILE GRACIA, DE CHILE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |