Drawing for MORAL FIXATION

USPTO serial 78593503

MORAL FIXATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MORAL FIXATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles J. Meyer

Charles J. Meyer Woodard Emhardt Moriarty McNett and Henry, LLP111 Monument CircleSuite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Body and beauty care cosmetics, namely face and body lotions, cosmetic suntanning preparations, skin gels for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans, skin conditioners, skin creams, skin lotions, skin cleansers, and skin tonersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 6, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 11, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 11, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 11, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 7, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance