USPTO serial 78593533
I IHEALTHSERVICES IN PARTNERSHIP WITH AMERICA'S PHYSICIANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I IHEALTHSERVICES IN PARTNERSHIP WITH AMERICA'S PHYSICIANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Day
Christopher J. Day Law Office of Christopher DaySuite A-213 301 East Bethany Home RoadPhoenix, AZ 85012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Providing an online medical health records database, via a secured network, under the primary control of the patient that is linked to the patient's physician with access by other clinicians based upon patient approval; automated medical information reminders that are specific to the patient's medications or medical conditions; Medical services, namely, providing online medical consultations, providing prescriptions and prescription renewals via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |