Drawing for CLEANER. SMARTER. BETTER.

USPTO serial 78593592

CLEANER. SMARTER. BETTER.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEANER. SMARTER. BETTER.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia Smink Rogowski, Esq.

PATRICIA SMINK ROGOWSKI ESQ CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPPO BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017polyurethane foams for incorporation into mattresses, pillows and furniture cushionsACTIVE—
020mattresses, pillows, mattress toppers, furniture cushionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 24, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance