Drawing for METBANK CLASSIC CHECKING

USPTO serial 78593745

METBANK CLASSIC CHECKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with METBANK CLASSIC CHECKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry Werbin

SANDRA EDELMAN DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP250 PARK AVE 15TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10177UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Banking ServicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 29, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 29, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 21, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 23, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance