USPTO serial 78594026
PLUSMODO DESIGN JORGE PENSI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PLUSMODO DESIGN JORGE PENSI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HERFORD, DE
Herford, DE
Herford, DE
Herford, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Goldberg
Richard M. Goldberg RICHARD M GOLDBERG25 East Salem StreetSuite 419HACKENSACK, NJ 07601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | KITCHEN FURNITURE, NAMELY, TABLES, CHAIRS AND BENCHES; AND BUILT-IN KITCHEN CABINETS, CUPBOARDS AND SHELVES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POGGENPOHL GROUP HOLDING GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Poggenpohl Möbelwerke GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Poggenpohl Möbelwerke GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Poggenpohl Möbelwerke GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named PLUSMODO DESIGN JORGE PENSI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 9, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 9, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |