USPTO serial 78594253
INTELLISKIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLISKIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edwin D. Schindler
EDWIN D SCHINDLER EDWIN D SCHINDLERFIVE HIRSCH AVE P O BOX 966CORAM, NY 11727-0966UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN CARE GOODS, INCLUDING, DAY CREAMS, NIGHT CREAMS, SERUMS, INCLUDING REPAIR SERUMS, HYDRATION CREAMS, THROAT CREAMS, FACE MASKS, EYE MASKS, MOISTURIZING CREAMS AND LOTIONS, FACE CLEANSERS, FACE TONERS, EYE CREAMS, EYE CONTOUR CREAMS, LIP CONTOUR CREAMS, ANTI-WRINKLE CREAMS, HAND CREAMS AND LOTIONS, BODY CREAMS AND LOTIONS, FOOT CREAMS, FOOT LOTIONS AND FOOT GELS, LIP BALMS; GLOVES AND SOCKS FOR SKIN CARE; ANTI-ACNE GOODS IN ALL OF THE AFOREMENTIONED FORMS OF SKIN GOODS, INCLUDING CREAMS, LOTIONS, GELS, SERUMS, GLOVES AND SOCKS; EYE PATCHES; AND LIP PLUMPERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |