USPTO serial 78594765
MENTAL HEALTH BREAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MENTAL HEALTH BREAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyle T. Peterson
KYLE T. PETERSON PATTERSON, THUENTE, SKAAR & CHRISTENSEN4800 IDS CENTER80TH SOUTH 8TH STREETMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED CD-ROMS, DVDS, VIDEO TAPES, VIDEO DISCS, COMPACT DISCS, AND AUDIO TAPES, NOT CONTAINING SOFTWARE, ALL FEATURING MENTAL HEALTH EDUCATION AND INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | CASE STUDY MATERIALS, NAMELY, BOOKS, WORKBOOKS, CASES, ARTICLES, PAMPHLETS, BROCHURES, NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZINES, NEWSLETTERS, AND WORKSHEETS, ALL FEATURING MENTAL HEALTH EDUCATION AND INFORMATION; PRINTED MATERIALS, NAMELY, BOOKS, WORKBOOKS, MANUALS, NEWSPAPERS, AND MAGAZINES, ALL FEATURING MENTAL HEALTH EDUCATION AND INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | INTERNET WEB BROADCASTING RELATING TO MENTAL HEALTH EDUCATION AND INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL INTERNET PRESENTATIONS FEATURING MENTAL HEALTH EDUCATION AND INFORMATION; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING MENTAL HEALTH EDUCATION AND INFORMATION; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF MENTAL HEALTH; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVISION OF SEMINARS, CLASSES, LECTURES, ALL RELATING TO MENTAL HEALTH EDUCATION AND INFORMATION; SCRIPT WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF PRINTED MEDIA MATERIALS RELATING TO MENTAL HEALTH EDUCATION AND INFORMATION; PUBLISHING OF BOOK REVIEWS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ungar, Thomas
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MENTAL HEALTH BREAK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |