USPTO serial 78594974
VIMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3687481Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2009
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cross Country Automotive Services, Inc.
Medford, MA
Other trademarks owned by Cross Country Automotive Services, Inc.
Cross Country Automotive Services, Inc.
Medford, MA
Other trademarks owned by Cross Country Automotive Services, Inc.
Cross Country Automotive Services, Inc.
Medford, MA
Other trademarks owned by Cross Country Automotive Services, Inc.
MEDFORD, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
Douglas R. Wolf WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | [ Providing information to drivers of vehicles on roads, namely, providing contact directory information, service provider referrals, and repair facility referrals; ] Tracking and monitoring services of service providers for insurance compliance; Acting on behalf of insurance companies, namely, arranging for the transport of vehicles to facilitate the resolution of insurance claims including repairs and determinations of total loss | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | [ providing information to drivers of vehicles on roads, namely, providing vehicle repair status information; emergency roadside services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | [ Providing information to drivers of vehicles on roads, namely, providing road and traffic information, travel information relating to points of interest, vehicle towing information, flight information, travel information, and travel routes; Arranging car rentals; ] Acting on behalf of insurance companies, namely, transporting vehicles to facilitate the resolution of insurance claims including repairs and determinations of total loss | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cross Country Automotive Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cross Country Automotive Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cross Country Automotive Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AGERO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named VIMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |