USPTO serial 78595005
Y? SIT DOWN. STAND UP. LOVE. HATE. BAD. GOOD. UGLY. PRETTY. INSIDE. OUTSIDE. FAT FREE. SUGAR FREE. LOW. CARB. CITY. SUBURBIA. FAT. THIN. BUY. RENT. YOUNG. OLD. FAST. SLOW. REPUBLICAN. DEMOCRAT. CHEAP. EXPENSIVE. BLACK. WHITE. NOT. LATER. CAT. DOG. HIGH. L
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Y? SIT DOWN. STAND UP. LOVE. HATE. BAD. GOOD. UGLY. PRETTY. INSIDE. OUTSIDE. FAT FREE. SUGAR FREE. LOW. CARB. CITY. SUBURBIA. FAT. THIN. BUY. RENT. YOUNG. OLD. FAST. SLOW. REPUBLICAN. DEMOCRAT. CHEAP. EXPENSIVE. BLACK. WHITE. NOT. LATER. CAT. DOG. HIGH. L?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna Mirman Broome
Daisy Duke Corp. Att: Lisa Interdonato, Pres.236 West 26th Street2nd Floor EAst, Suite 203New York, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, shorts, sweatpants, overalls, shirts, tee-shirts, sweatshirts, blouses, skirts, dresses, jackets, vests, coats, rainwear, shoes, lingerie, sleepwear, loungewear, swimwear, gloves, socks, hosiery, belts, scarves, hats, ties, slippers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DAISY DUKE CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by DAISY DUKE CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named Y? SIT DOWN. STAND UP. LOVE. HATE. BAD. GOOD. UGLY. PRETTY. INSIDE. OUTSIDE. FAT FREE. SUGAR FREE. LOW. CARB. CITY. SUBURBIA. FAT. THIN. BUY. RENT. YOUNG. OLD. FAST. SLOW. REPUBLICAN. DEMOCRAT. CHEAP. EXPENSIVE. BLACK. WHITE. NOT. LATER. CAT. DOG. HIGH. L
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PBIR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |