USPTO serial 78595084
EYETALK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELZER, LYDIA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EYETALK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer hardware; computer hardware for teleconferencing, video conferencing and electronic conferencing; computer peripherals; computer servers; telecommunication hardware and software; cameras; audio and video equipment; flat panel display screens; electronic whiteboards; digital projectors and accessories; rear projection screens; speakerphones; microphones; computer software for audio and video teleconferencing, for audio and video streaming; computer software for integrating, controlling, recording, enhancing, securing and managing video, voice and data communications; computer and telecommunications software for transmitting and reproducing voice, audio, video, images and data; digital signal processors | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of audio and video conferencing facilities; maintenance, installation and repair of computer hardware, computer systems, telecommunications equipment, audio and video equipment; teleconferencing services; network conferencing services; providing facilities and equipment for audio and video conferencing; Web conferencing services; telecommunications services, namely, electronic, digital and wireless transmission of data, voice and video; broadcasting services; VOIP services; telecommunications consulting services; rental of telecommunications equipment; electronic storage, searching and retrieval of video, audio and data; technical customer support services; calibration, alignment and diagnostic services; computer bandwidth and network management services; rental of computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals and audio and video equipment; updating and maintenance of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |