USPTO serial 78595122
TAZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph H. Turner Jr.
JOSEPH H TURNER JR JOSEPH H TURNER JR PC6139 OAKBROOK PKWY STE DNORCROSS, GA 30093-1705UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Food Stuff, Namely - Bread, Chapati, Naan, Tandoori Naam, Roghani Naan, Onion Naan, Vegetable Naan, Sheernal, Taftaan, Kulchu, Paratha, Stuff Paratha, Aloo Paratha, Vegetable Paratha, Keema Paratha, Palak Paratha, Cookies, Sweets, Deserts, Lassi, Mango Lassi, Flour, Wheat Flour, Rice, Spices, Masala, Garam Masala, Pickles, Juices, Fried Onions, Ginger and Garlic Paste, Nuts, Fruits, Dry Fruits; Prepared and Frozen Foods, Namely chicken and Beef Products, Namely - Chicken Nuggets, chicken tenders, beef patty, chicken patty, hot chicken wings, hot dogs, chappli kabab, shami kabab, seekh kabab, bihari kabab, reshmi kabab, chicken cutlets, beef cutlets, haleem kofta kabab, chicken boti, beef boti, chicken charga, chicken charga, chicken seekh kabab, beef haleem, chicken haleem, fajeeta beef, fajeeta chicken | ACTIVE | Mar 18, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |