Drawing for RITE AID RITE CARE

USPTO serial 78596142

RITE AID RITE CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RITE AID RITE CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jake D. Feldman, Esq.

BRETT I MILLER ESQ MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWATTN TMSUWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044pharmaceutical consultation servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 30, 2006GECGACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 16, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 16, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 16, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 17, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance