USPTO serial 78596343
SOLO PLAYER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOLO PLAYER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John K. Park
JOHN K PARK PARK & SUTTON LLP1318 S GAREY AVEPOMONA, CA 91766-4411UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, Women's and Children's, pants, shirts, shorts, caps, visors, skirts, jackets, T-shirts, belts, hats, jerseys, tops, socks, anklets, bandannas, gloves, gowns, halter tops, head bands, wrist bands, swimwear, bathing caps, bathing trunks, bathrobes, beach cover-ups, beachwear, blouses, body suits, tank tops, ties, bras, underwear, coats, coveralls, cover-ups, dresses, vests, infant wear, jeans, jumpers, kilts, kerchiefs, coats, sweaters, leggings, leotards, lingerie, miniskirts, mittens, pajamas, panties, pantyhose, ponchos, pullovers, rainwear, robes, shoes, boots, sandals, and rompers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |