USPTO serial 78596615
QUANTUM VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUANTUM VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon R. Meyer
SHELDON R MEYER FLIESLER MEYER LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR LBBY 4SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Television sets; cathode ray tube (CRT) television sets; projector televisions; video display monitors; computer video displays, namely multiple video display units connected together to present an image which is a combination of the images on the individual video display units and namely a video projector with a sound system; television monitors; computer monitors, excluding computer hardware and software other than computer video displays and computer monitors; flight simulators; head-up instrumentation displays for aircraft; vehicle head-up displays (HUD); electric luminescent instrument display panels for monitoring the operation of electrical and mechanical systems; thin film resonant microcavity transducers designed to be the source of light used in the manufacture of projectors, televisions, movie projectors and the like; biotechnology instruments, namely molecular analyzers using a thin film resonant microcavity light to identify and track molecular species; biotechnology instruments, namely molecular analyzers using a thin film resonant microcavity light to identify and track molecular species; biotechnology instruments for scientific research and analysis in the nature of biotechnology instrument light sources, namely lights being thin film resonant microcavity transducers to identify and track molecular species, and for use with real time polymerase chain reactors (PCR), microtitre plate readers, microarray scanners, multicapillary detection sequencers, and lab-on-a-chip analyzers; photolithography tools, namely tools to imprint patterns for circuit boards and silica wafers, which patterns can then be transferred to the circuit board and silica wafers using etching techniques and the like, and silica wafers using etching techniques and the like | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |